英譯中：請將以下英文翻譯成正確流暢的中文。（25 分）
Finance ministers and central bank governors from the Group of Seven have
wrapped up their two-day talks in Paris. They have adopted a communique
that urges cooperation on addressing economic risks arising from the Middle
East conflict and dangers posed by new artificial intelligence models to
financial systems. The G7 said it will work to enhance information sharing
and identify best practices.
參考解答（AI 生成，非官方）
一、全文翻譯：七大工業國集團（Group of Seven, G7）的財政部長與中央銀行總裁，已在巴黎結束為期兩天的會談。他們通過一份公報，呼籲各方攜手合作，因應中東衝突所衍生的經濟風險，以及新型人工智慧模型對金融體系構成的危害。G7表示，將致力強化資訊共享，並找出最佳實務做法。
二、專有名詞處理：Group of Seven 譯「七大工業國集團」，首次出現時宜加註 G7；finance ministers and central bank governors 譯「財政部長與中央銀行總裁」，我國央行首長體制用「總裁」，不宜譯為「行長」；communique 譯「公報」；best practices 譯「最佳實務（做法）」，屬政策文件慣用語，不可譯成「最好的練習」。
三、句法重組：原文以 urges cooperation on addressing A and B 的形式，將兩個名詞片語並列，中文若照搬會形成過長定語。宜拆為「因應……經濟風險」與「……對金融體系構成的危害」兩個動賓結構，以「以及」銜接；addressing 譯「因應」，比「處理」更符政策語境。
四、語序與語態：wrapped up 譯「結束」，two-day talks 譯「為期兩天的會談」；arising from 譯「所衍生的」、posed by 譯「所構成的」，將英文被動轉為中文主動；The G7 said it will work to… 譯「G7表示，將致力……」，主語一致、語氣正式，符合新聞稿文體。
五、易錯提醒：dangers posed by new AI models to financial systems 的重心是「對金融體系的危害」，不可誤譯為「AI 模型本身的危險」；information sharing 譯「資訊共享」，非「情報分享」；enhance 譯「強化」、identify 譯「找出、辨識」，避免口語化。
英文應用文：請根據以下指示撰寫英文回應文。（25 分）
一位外籍商務人士在本地英文媒體投書，反映在我國申請居留與創業的
數位行政流程中，英文說明仍有部分用語晦澀難懂，導致效率不彰。身
為政府新聞人員，請撰寫一篇約100 字的英文回應信（Letter to the
Editor），表達政府近來優化官方網站雙語介面的努力，並強調政府正積
極導入AI 輔助及線上雙語客服，以提升外籍人士無障礙數位服務體驗。
參考解答（AI 生成，非官方）
一、回應信全文（約100字）：Dear Editor, I refer to the recent letter from a foreign businessperson about the English wording in our digital procedures for residence and business applications. We appreciate the feedback. The government has been optimizing the bilingual interface of its official websites, simplifying terminology and standardizing translations so that foreign residents can follow every step. We are also introducing AI-assisted guidance and online bilingual customer service to answer queries in real time. We welcome further suggestions, and we will keep working to make our digital services genuinely accessible to all. Sincerely, (Name), Government Information Office.
二、文體與結構：Letter to the Editor 屬公開投書回應，格式為稱謂、正文、結語與署名四部分。正文宜「先致謝、再說明、後邀請」，即感謝對方指教、陳述政府作為、表達持續溝通意願；全篇約100字，不宜長篇辯解，也不宜出現公文簽核用語。
三、語氣與用詞：採第一人稱複數 We，展現機關立場而非個人意見；動詞用現在完成進行式（has been optimizing、are also introducing），凸顯持續推動而非一次性措施；以 appreciate、welcome further suggestions 取代 sorry、you are wrong 等防禦性字眼，做到不卑不亢。
四、內容扣題：須完整涵蓋三項要素——優化官方網站雙語介面、導入 AI 輔助、線上雙語客服；可補簡化術語（simplifying terminology）與即時回覆（in real time）作為具體作法，使論述有細節而非空泛承諾。
五、扣分提醒：字數明顯超過或不足、漏寫署名、誤用 Dear Sir/Madam 而未對應投書人、把 AI 寫成取代人工而忽略「輔助」定位，均為常見失分點；另避免使用縮寫與過度口語，以維持官方回應之專業形象。
英文作文：（50 分）
Write a two-paragraph essay with a total length of about 150 to 200 words
(approximately 75 to 100 words per paragraph) on the topic of “Government
Branding.” In the first paragraph of your writing, explain whether modern
governments should embrace brand management as private corporations do.
In the second paragraph, from the perspective of a public official, outline the
characteristics and core identity value of your ideal government brand.
參考解答（AI 生成，非官方）
一、作文全文（約178字）：Modern governments should embrace brand management, with qualifications. A brand is not a logo; it is the sum of promises an institution makes and the trust citizens place in it. Corporations use branding to differentiate products and secure loyalty, and governments can borrow that discipline to communicate policy coherently, attract investment and make services recognizable. But the analogy has limits: a company answers to shareholders, a government to all citizens, including dissenters. Branding must therefore clarify rather than embellish, and never substitute slogans for delivery.
二、第二段全文：From my perspective as a public official, an ideal government brand rests on integrity, responsiveness, consistency and inclusiveness. Integrity means telling the truth even when the news is unwelcome. Responsiveness means listening through complaints, consultations and open data, and being seen to act. Consistency means the same standard at every counter and on every platform. Inclusiveness means plain language and multilingual access, so no resident is excluded. Its core identity value is trustworthiness in the service of the public good — a promise kept, day after day, rather than an image projected.
四、論證技巧：第一段採「讓步式」結構，先肯認品牌管理可用於政策溝通、招商與服務辨識，再以問責對象不同（股東 vs. 全體公民，含異議者）設下界線，導出「品牌應澄清而非美化、不能以口號替代施政」的結論，展現批判思考而非單向背書。
五、第二段鋪陳：以 integrity、responsiveness、consistency、inclusiveness 四項特質並列，每項以一句定義支撐，形成排比；末句收束於核心價值 trustworthiness in the service of the public good，並以「日復一日的兌現而非形象的投射」對比企業品牌，回應首段。
六、用語與扣分提醒：宜用 be seen to act、rest on、in the service of 等正式搭配；避免 I think、a lot of 等口語，並注意品牌（brand）與行銷（marketing）、形象（image）之區別。字數不足、只寫企業案例而未談政府、或第二段未點出核心價值者，均易失分。