民國114年 高考三級 新聞(選試英文) 英文(包括作文、翻譯與應用文)考古題

民國114年 高考三級 新聞(選試英文) 英文(包括作文、翻譯與應用文)收錄考選部官方試題,共 4 題可線上瀏覽,考選部未公告本科目答案。

官方資料

題目與答案

第1題

英譯中:請將下段英文譯成正確、流暢的中文(20 分) Governments, particularly in large democracies, often suffer from institutional inertia, fragmented communication, and overlapping responsibilities. A centralized efficiency department could systematically audit agencies, implement data-driven reforms, and introduce digital tools to reduce paperwork and improve service delivery. By fostering interdepartmental coordination and leveraging artificial intelligence, this department could help ensure that taxpayer money is utilized optimally.

參考解答(AI 生成,非官方)

  • 參考譯文:政府,尤其是大型民主國家,常受制度惰性、溝通零碎化與權責重疊所苦。若能設立一個集中化的效率專責部門,便可系統性稽核各機關、推動資料驅動的改革,並導入數位工具以減少文書作業、改善公共服務遞送。該部門也可促進跨部會協調、運用人工智慧,協助確保納稅人的錢獲得最適運用。
  • 關鍵詞須精準對應:institutional inertia 譯為「制度惰性」,指組織沿襲舊規、難以變革;fragmented communication 譯「溝通零碎化」,強調資訊無法整合;overlapping responsibilities 譯「權責重疊」,即多個機關共管同一事務。centralized efficiency department 可譯「集中化的效率專責部門」,不宜直譯為「中央化效率部」。
  • 英文以三個長句鋪陳問題、對策與效益,中文宜依「問題—做法—目的」重組。第一句保留總說;第二句將 audit、implement、introduce 三個動詞並列,譯成「稽核、推動、導入」;第三句把 By fostering... and leveraging... 轉為「透過促進……及運用……」,並將 help ensure 譯為「協助確保」,避免「幫助保證」的生硬說法。
  • 易錯處包括:democracies 指「民主國家」而非抽象「民主」;agencies 在此指「行政機關」,不是「代理機構」;service delivery 宜譯「公共服務遞送」或「服務供給」,不宜譯「服務交付」;taxpayer money 可譯「納稅人的錢」或「公帑」,但前後須一致。另 optimal 譯「最適」比「最佳」更貼近政策評估語境。

第2題

中譯英:請將下段中文譯成正確、流暢的英文(20 分) 波音公司曾是美國航空工程的典範,但近年卻成為企業管理失當與監管 鬆散風險的代表。這場危機始於兩起致命的737 MAX 空難――分別發 生於2018 年的印尼與2019 年的衣索比亞,共造成346 人喪生。調查指 出,肇事原因主要來自一套有缺陷的自動飛行控制系統(MCAS),更令 人震驚的是,波音未能適當向飛行員與監管機構揭露該系統的風險。後 續調查揭露,波音內部的企業文化過度強調產品快速上市與股東利益, 犧牲了工程品質與安全標準。更嚴重的是,美國聯邦航空總署(FAA) 在飛機審核過程中竟大幅依賴波音自行認證,引發外界對監管機構是否 受到業界壓力、喪失獨立性的深切質疑。

參考解答(AI 生成,非官方)

  • Boeing was once a model of American aeronautical engineering, but in recent years it has become a symbol of the risks of corporate mismanagement and lax regulatory oversight. The crisis began with two fatal 737 MAX crashes—in Indonesia in 2018 and in Ethiopia in 2019—which together claimed 346 lives. Investigations indicated that the crashes were mainly caused by a defective automated flight control system known as MCAS; even more alarming, Boeing failed to adequately disclose the risks of the system to pilots and regulators.
  • Subsequent investigations revealed that Boeing's corporate culture placed excessive emphasis on bringing products to market quickly and on shareholder interests, at the expense of engineering quality and safety standards. More seriously, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) relied heavily on Boeing's self-certification during the entire aircraft certification process, prompting deep and widespread public concerns about whether the regulator had come under serious industry pressure and ultimately lost its independence.
  • 關鍵譯法:aeronautical engineering 譯「航空工程」;corporate mismanagement 譯「企業管理失當」;lax regulatory oversight 譯「監管鬆散」;claimed 346 lives 譯「造成346人喪生」;defective 譯「有缺陷的」;disclose 譯「揭露」;self-certification 譯「自行認證」。MCAS 首次出現可保留縮寫,並補充全名 Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System。
  • 中文原句多為「調查指出」「後續調查揭露」等動詞開頭,英文宜用 Investigations indicated that...、Subsequent investigations revealed that... 帶出名詞子句。「更令人震驚的是」可譯 even more alarming;「更嚴重的是」譯 More seriously。「引發外界……質疑」處理為 prompting deep and widespread public concerns about whether...,以 whether 子句保留質疑內容。
  • 常見失誤包括把「典範」譯成 standard(偏「標準」),宜用 model 或 paragon;把「監管機構」譯成 monitor,宜用 regulator;把「股東利益」譯成 shareholder benefits,宜用 shareholder interests;把「喪失獨立性」譯成 lost independent,應為 lost its independence。時態以過去式敘述空難與調查,陳述長期文化問題可用過去式或現在完成式。

第3題

應用文寫作:請依提示寫一封英文電子郵件(120~150 字)(20 分) 根據OpenAI 資料,韓國是僅次於美國、擁有最多ChatGPT 付費用戶的 國家。OpenAI 表示,因應韓國市場對ChatGPT 服務的需求大幅成長, 該公司將在首爾設立首間辦公室,並已在韓國設立在地法人。請寫一封 英文信邀請OpenAI 公司於明年也在臺灣設立辦公室。

參考解答(AI 生成,非官方)

  • 參考郵件: Subject: Invitation to Open an OpenAI Office in Taiwan Dear OpenAI Team, I am writing to invite OpenAI to establish an office in Taiwan next year as part of your expanding presence in Asia. As you have reported, South Korea has the second-largest number of paid ChatGPT users after the United States, demonstrating the strong demand for your services across Asia. Taiwan offers a similarly promising environment, with a highly educated workforce, world-class semiconductor and AI industries, and a government committed to digital transformation. A local office would enable OpenAI to collaborate more closely with enterprises, universities, and public agencies, while adapting products and policies to local needs. We would be pleased to facilitate introductions to potential partners and discuss ways to support your investment. I hope you will consider making Taiwan your next regional base. Sincerely, [Name] [Title, Organization]
  • 寫作策略上,先以主旨句表明邀請,再引用韓國付費用戶規模作為外部佐證,接著列舉台灣的人才、半導體與人工智慧產業、數位轉型政策等優勢,最後提出可協助媒合夥伴與投資誘因,降低對方來台設點的資訊成本。
  • 結構採「主旨—稱謂—正文—敬語—署名」:正文第一段破題,第二段說明台灣條件,第三段提出合作方式與邀請。語氣宜正式、誠懇且保留彈性,多用 would、hope、consider 等委婉用語,避免命令式或過度承諾。
  • 用語方面,establish an office 比 set up a branch 正式;paid ChatGPT users 宜保留原詞;digital transformation 譯「數位轉型」。字數須控制在 120 至 150 字,句子不宜過長,並以具體理由取代空泛讚美,才能符合應用文評分要點。

第4題

英文作文:請根據說明寫一篇約300 字的英文作文(40 分) Background: In many developed and developing countries, life expectancy is increasing while birth rates are declining. This demographic shift means a growing percentage of the population is over the age of 65, while the working-age population is shrinking. As a result, fewer workers are supporting more retirees through taxes, pensions, and healthcare systems. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Governments should raise the retirement age to address the economic challenges of an aging population. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

參考解答(AI 生成,非官方)

  • Governments should raise the retirement age to address the economic challenges of an aging population, but only if the change is gradual and accompanied by supportive labor policies. I agree with the statement because longer life expectancy, labor shortages, and the fiscal burden of pensions make the traditional retirement age increasingly unsustainable. With fertility rates falling, the ratio of workers to retirees is shrinking, putting pressure on public budgets.
  • First, people are living and staying healthy longer than previous generations. In many developed countries, a person who retires at 65 may spend two decades or more in retirement, while the number of taxpayers supporting each pensioner continues to fall. Raising the retirement age modestly, for example by one or two years over a decade, would keep experienced workers in the labor force and reduce pressure on pension funds without abruptly cutting benefits. This would also preserve tax revenue and consumer demand.
  • Second, many economies face labor shortages as birth rates decline. Older workers often possess skills, institutional knowledge, and professional networks that cannot be replaced quickly. Countries such as Japan and Germany have encouraged later retirement and flexible work arrangements, allowing older employees to work part-time or mentor younger staff. Such policies can ease labor-market gaps while giving workers more choice about how and when to retire. This not only keeps them financially independent but also transfers valuable experience to younger colleagues.
  • However, raising the retirement age alone is not enough. Governments must also improve retraining, occupational health, and protections for workers in physically demanding jobs, who may not be able to work longer. A phased, flexible approach—combined with incentives for employers to hire older workers—would make the policy fair and effective. For these reasons, I believe raising the retirement age is a necessary but not sufficient response to population aging.